LDE
Bryant Young is still here, and I love him. He’s not his former self, but IMO he is still a viable player either inside or outside. Clearly we’ll need to find a replacement STAT, but in the meantime, I think BY can hold it down for another year, maybe even 2.

The Solution: Throw every $$$ you have at the best FA you can find in 2008, or draft the top prospect at this position in the draft

NT
Isaac Sopoaga, Anthony Adams, and Ronald Fields are all pretty good players for this spot as I see it. For a 3-man rotation, I honestly think we could do A LOT worse. If Adams is gone after this season, I think replacing him with a mid-round draft choice in one of the upcoming two drafts would be fine. NT is arguably the spot we need the least help at IMO. Could we use an upgrade? Perhaps. But as Fields and Sopoaga continue to mature and learn technique, I think they both have potential.

The Solution: Stick with what you got

RDE
I think Marques Douglas does a pretty good job all told. His job isn’t to rack up numbers, but to create space for the LBs, and I personally feel that he does a good job doing that. However, I still think we could use another guy to bring in either situationally, or pushing Douglas to a more situational role.

The Solution: Sign Chad Lavalais this upcoming offseason


Read more…
View Comments (13) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

Christ Breaks Leg?
by Erik Klackner

I don’t remember this being in the Bible.

The Son of God himself, disguised as 49ers 1st round draft choice Vernon Davis, will miss the next 4 weeks with a broken leg. The injury occurred on the biggest play of the 49ers/Eagles game on Sunday, when Christ Davis was attempting to run down Eagles DT Mike Patterson, a known sinner, following his fumble recovery at the 2 yard line. But a funny thing happened on the way to Patterson’s forgiveness…

Jesus pulled up gimpy.

How can the Lamb of God, Savior of all mankind (and the 49ers in particular) fail to save a soul in need? I asked Rabbi Aaron Berkowitz of Temple Beth El in Portland, OR for his opinion on the matter.

“We don’t view Christ as the Messiah or Son of God. We are still awaiting the arrival of the Messiah at a later date.”


Read more…
View Comments (16) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

Kevan Barlow vs. Frank Gore
After two consecutive disappointing seasons, Kevan Barlow is clearly at the end of his rope. BUT, Mike Nolan has been nothing but complimentary regarding Barlow and his play last season. I too felt like Barlow ran hard last year and was particularly good in the open field but was hindered by the patchwork and inexperienced offensive line. However, Frank Gore didn’t seem to experience those problems running behind the same line, and there in lies the current dilemma. Gore was tremendously impressive as a rookie, displaying quickness, burst, power, and most importantly, health. Barlow has the advantage in the “other” aspects of the game, i.e. blitz pickup, passing game, etc., but another full offseason can only help Gore’s development in those areas. This competition could go down to the wire.

My prediction: Barlow wins the starting job and gets a slightly larger majority of the carries this season, while Gore plays a significant role as the complimentary back.

Walt Harris vs. Every CB on the roster not named Shawntae Spencer
Spencer appears firmly entrenched as the #1 CB on the roster; Walt Harris is currently penciled in as the #2 CB starting on the opposite side. But with a plethora of legitimate options available, will Harris be able to hold onto the job? Mike Rumph, while rumored to be on the cutting block, showed flashes in his second year at CB, but that was sadly wiped out by 2 years of injuries. Bruce Thornton was brought in during the middle of last season and started out with a bang before struggling a bit down the stretch. Derrick Johnson impressed when given the opportunity and seemed to make plays every time he was out there. And Sammy Davis was acquired from the San Diego Chargers in the Rashaun Woods trade; Davis has been a starter and has valuable experience, despite being a disappointment with the Chargers. Harris is a consistent performer, but he is getting older and has definitely lost a step. He won’t make many critical mistakes, but I don’t see him making many big plays either.

My prediction: Harris will maintain the #2 job through the preseason and the beginning of the season, but Derrick Johnson will continue to shine and eventually take over that spot.


Read more…
View Comments (6) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

Round 1, Pick 6
Vernon Davis, TE, Maryland

We all know the story by now. The 49ers need offensive playmakers. Davis has established himself in the same class as Reggie Bush in that category. Seems to make perfect sense.

Round 1, Pick 22
Manny Lawson, OLB, North Carolina State

The addition of the 22nd pick gives the 49ers amazing flexibility. There are a lot of directions they could go with this selection, but Lawson has the highest ceiling. Every bit the athletic freak Vernon Davis is, Lawson would give the 49ers the replacement (and dare I say upgrade) for Julian Peterson that they need. The only concern is that Lawson is still raw, relatively speaking; would he be able to start right off the bat, something the Niners likely need?

Round 3, Pick 84
Pat Watkins, FS, Florida State

A superb value for the end of Day 1, Watkins has the experience to start immediately opposite Tony Parrish. Tall, rangy, and with great coverage skills, Watkins is an upgrade over Mike Adams and helps solidify the back line of the 49ers defense.

Round 4, Pick 100
Greg Lee, WR, Pittsburgh

A 1st round talent who left school too early. Lee has the potential to become a #1 caliber WR in the NFL, and Jerry Sullivan is as good as it gets for a position coach. Lee could compete with Derrick Hamilton and Marcus Maxwell for a 4th WR spot right off the bat.

Round 5, Pick 140
Lawrence Vickers, FB, Colorado

I’ve gone back and forth on Vickers, at times being really high on him, other times being really lukewarm. I’m currently somewhere in the middle; Vickers has a great all-around game, and can be a real weapon out of the backfield. His blocking is only above average in my estimation, but he has room to improve. Chris Hetherington is a solid veteran, but Vickers could become a legit starter very soon.


Read more…
View Comments (22) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

Vernon Davis Jesus Christ I Dunno!

Hear Me Out On This

For centuries, debate has raged about the true nature of Jesus Christ, philosopher, prophet, teacher, and to some, Redeemer of mankind. Even the most basic questions have drawn varying answers and spirited debate: what did Christ look like? Did he have brothers or sisters? What became of his Earthly parents? I do not claim to have the answers to all those vexing questions, however, I wanted to dig a little deeper into the first. What did Christ look like? I think I may have found the answer.

Jesus Christ is a gigantic black man who goes about 6’4’‘, 260 with his hair in dreadlocks and biceps that would make Hulk Hogan seem French.

I know what you’re thinking. ”That sounds a lot like Vernon Davis.” Yes it does.

Now, before you go all crazy on me, I am not comparing Vernon Davis to Jesus Christ.

I’m saying Vernon Davis IS Jesus Christ.

Bear with me.


Read more…
View Comments (56) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

by Erik Klackner

Round 1, Pick 6

Vernon Davis, TE, Maryland

The smart money seems to lean more and more towards Davis being the pick here. For my own money, I would be happy with Davis, or Michael Huff, or D’Brickashaw Ferguson, or Mario Williams. It’s a dead horse at this point, but we’ll beat it again: the 49ers desperately need offensive playmakers, and Davis is one of the best in this draft, and maybe the best of the WRs/TEs. The development of Alex Smith is the key to the future of this franchise, and a weapon like Davis can go a long way in making that development smooth. The TE is the new vogue position in the NFL, and Davis has the athleticism, speed, desire, work ethic, and skills to be the greatest at the position when all is said and done.


Read more…
View Comments (10) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

by Erik Klackner

03.13.06—I know what you’re thinking. What could possibly lead a grown man to make the title for an article about football with a lyric from a Shania Twain song? I wish I knew the answer. But just take comfort that I didn’t call it Man, I Feel Like A Woman.

The point of the title is simple: the state of panic that many 49er fans seem to be trapped in right now is overblown. It’s been running rampant for the last 2 days. “Oh, God, look at what everyone else is doing! We’re doomed!” Well my friends, relax and grab a smoke, because it ain’t that bad.

The St. Louis Rams have made several splashes in the free agent puddle, picking up LB Will Witherspoon from Carolina, DT La’Roi Glover from Dallas, and S Corey Chavous from Minnesota. Great. Witherspoon has all the appearances of a gamebreaker, but Chavous and Glover are both players that are on the downsides of their careers, and both were extremely overpaid. Meanwhile, Arizona made the biggest noise of all, landing Edgerrin James. Good for them. They had capable running backs last season (including a 2nd round pick in JJ Arrington) that accomplished nothing behind an inept offensive line. James will help, but the Cardinals had oodles of talent last season, and look where that got them.


Read more…
View Comments (20) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

by Erik Klackner

The hype machine has been in full force in the last month, incessantly pounding two words into our collective psyche until we have little choice but to become wide-eyed and carry on with the business of singing his praises: Reggie Bush.

Words that are normally reserved for the likes of Presidents and Popes are tossed Bush’s way: ‘once in a lifetime,’ ’special,’ ‘ordained by God.’ And with good reason; Bush is the odds on favorite to hoist the Heisman Trophy and is the key cog on a potential back-to-back-to-back National Championship squad. He is already the jewel in the eye of every NFL team for next April’s draft, though as of right now only a handful of teams have a realistic chance at screwing up more than their opponents enough to secure his rights.

Here in 49erLand, a place that smells terrific by the way, the talk is of a reunion between Bush and his Helix High School teammate, quarterback Alex Smith, this season’s #1 overall pick. Though the 49ers are currently not in the prime Bush position (which looks suspiciously like the way you’d look if you were on the receiving end of an enema), there is still a chance for them to lock up the #1 pick for the second consecutive year, provided they can lose the rest of their games.

I believe I might be the only person who is not on board the Bush Wagon of Happiness, but it is not from lack of trying. I want to believe. I really do. But this entire ordeal seems like an exercise in futility to me.

On a list of the 49ers needs, running back ranks somewhere in the bottom third in my estimation. Kevan Barlow, while not having benchmark numbers to show for his efforts, has improved from last season, and looks similar to the back that showed so much promise in 2003. Unfortunately, the offensive line looks nothing similar to 2003, and it has cost the offense immeasurably. Meanwhile, Frank Gore leads all rookie running backs in yards per carry despite the patchwork line, and has shown a tremendous ability to make plays, though he has battled injuries of late (which is cause for concern, though these injuries have nothing to do with his much publicized knee troubles).

Conversely, the young and inexperienced WR and QB corps have struggled through injuries and the very same unstable offensive line, providing virtually zero threat through the air.

What does all this mean?

It means I don’t want Reggie Bush. I don’t deny the man’s talent. I don’t deny the fact that he makes plays that very few people in history could have made. But one has to sort through the flash and razz-ma-tazz to see that there are still questions.

Can Bush run between the tackles? Can he earn the tough yards after contact? Can he carry the football 25 times a game? USC has another pretty good running back named LenDale White that does all those things, thereby enabling Bush to play his dynamic all-around game. In short, is Reggie Bush a true feature back that you can rely on to win you football games?

I don’t know the answer to that, but I do know that there is not sufficient evidence to suggest it. Other running backs coming through the draft in years past have certainly shared the load (one need look no further than last season when Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams were both top 5 picks), but they did not have 1/10th of the hype that Reggie Bush carries. Furthermore, both Brown and Williams had proven they could earn the tough yards required in the NFL playing in the brutal SEC. Bush certainly makes people look very silly with his amazing agility and moves, but they don’t miss like that in The League.

Despite my concerns with his ability to translate with the same effectiveness from college to pro football, I still would not have qualms about him being drafted #1, because his talent is indeed undeniable. But should the 49ers end up in the top spot, would the selection of Bush make much sense?

I don’t think so. Unless the 49ers effectively wasted a 3rd round selection on Frank Gore in last year’s draft. You don’t spend #1 pick scratch on a guy who’s going to split carries. You only toss that kind of coin to someone who is going to carry your team on his own legs, at least in my world where feature backs are true feature backs (and where candy is free for children under age 10).

While the consensus that the 49ers need offensive playmakers is something I completely agree with, I don’t believe that you can just pick any playmaker regardless of position, simply because the salary cap makes it virtually impossible to do so without restricting everything else on your team. Ideally, the 49ers could use a true #1 receiver to supplement Brandon Lloyd and Arnaz Battle, but that player might not be available in this draft. They could also desperately use a tight end to provide that presence in the middle of the field that they have so clearly missed with Eric Johnson sidelined this season; this draft is very deep at tight end with the likes of Mercedes Lewis, Vernon Davis, Leonard Pope, and Dominique Byrd.

Additionally, the 49ers will most likely need to add a linebacker as Julian Peterson, Derek Smith, and Andre Carter are all free agents. It is unlikely that the team will be able to re-sign all three, so the draft is the likely target for a replacement, again at a very deep position with AJ Hawk, Chad Greenway, Ahmad Brooks, Abdul Hodge, and Demeco Ryans all available. The secondary could also use some assistance, possibly in the form of Jimmy Williams from Virginia Tech.

At the end of the day, while Reggie Bush is unquestionably a special talent who COULD have a tremendous career in the NFL, he absolutely does not fit into the needs of the 49ers at this juncture. They clearly have several other more pressing needs than running back, and in my opinion drafting Bush would only cripple the team in other areas. Should the 49ers end up with Bush, I most certainly will be excited, but probably a bit more tempered than most.

Besides, who’s to say the 49ers will even be in a position to create that dream Bush/Gore backfield tandem? Unfortunately Green Bay, New York, and Houston all have something to say about that. But hey, at least Florida doesn’t.

View Comments (0) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

by Erik Klackner

Maybe it wasn’t the coach after all.

Amazingly, it appears that no matter who coaches the team, having arguably the least talented starting roster in the NFL makes it difficult to win. Furthermore, being beset by injuries to key players doesn’t seem to help the cause either.

In a game that yours truly labeled a must-win in a previous column, the 2005 San Francisco 49ers took a page from the 2004 San Francisco 49ers and got whipped by perennial doormat (and lone cause of victory last season) Arizona on national television. I would like to say, in my own defense (a defense that I would consider selling to the 49ers for a box of donuts and a cheap to moderately priced hooker), that when I wrote the article in question, Julian Peterson, Jonas Jennings, and Arnaz Battle were not expected to miss the game. Perhaps that information would change one’s outlook, but even then, based on how they played for most of the game against Dallas, that same one would have every reason to believe that they could compete and win the contest.

Not so much.

Scientists may still be trying to figure out the mysteries of time travel, but if they haven’t consulted the 49ers, they might want to look into it. This game was eerily reminiscent of 2004, when the 49ers were the laughing stock of the NFL, and they appear poised to return to that same pit of destruction again this season. And somewhere, probably his house, I have to wonder what was running through Dennis Erickson’s mind watching the festivities on Sunday night.

Could you blame him for laughing? Punching a wall? Drinking? All of the above? Here’s a man who was completely thrown under a bus by the 49ers organization, blamed for their failures in 2004 by team owner Dr. John York, and sent packing just 2 years into a 5-year deal that was signed when the team was still laden with veteran talent. After a 7-9 record in 2003 (which could have easily been 10-6 or 11-5 if they had anyone with shoes other than Owen Pochman and Co.), the 49ers cut bait with virtually all of that veteran talent, leaving the carcass, also known as what you see now, for Erickson to rot with. And he did. And he was fired for it. But guess what?

Apparently it isn’t just attitude. Surprisingly, talent and health play the most important parts in the melodrama that is the NFL. Dennis Erickson in 2004 didn’t have any. Mike Nolan in 2005 doesn’t have any. Whoops.

A man with the reputation for being an unbelievably miserly, tight-fisted bastard like Dr. York surely is having nightmares over that $20 million he forked over to rid himself of Erickson and former GM Terry Donahue. That, and waking up next to Denise York would make any man go into crisis mode. And who could blame him? After enduring an off-season in which he took unrelenting heat for the poor performance in 2004, Dr. York took the bull by the horns and made changes. Some changes.

Mike Nolan, after an impressive victory in Week 1 over arch-rival St. Louis, has watched his team get completely beaten senseless by an elite Philadelphia Eagles squad, lose a close game to rival Dallas in which they held the lead for most of the game, and completely tank in front of an international audience on ESPN (the only game of any TV significance the 49ers have this year). If Baltimore weren’t struggling almost as badly as the 49ers, Nolan would probably be second-guessing that gutsy decision to take this job. And who could blame him?

Injuries appear destined to destroy yet another season of 49ers football. Having the least amount of talent is hard enough, but to have large chunks of that talent taken away by Mother Ailment makes the job impossible. Yes, I said impossible. If the 49ers season continues to progress as it has so far, they will almost assuredly finish with the worst record in the league yet again, something Nolan said from day 1 he never wanted to experience. But how can you not when you’re fighting a battle that no one in their right mind would ever agree to fight? It is a task that simply cannot be accomplished by any coach, no matter who it is.

Which brings me back to the title of this piece: Here’s To You, Dennis Erickson. You endured a season of what Mike Nolan finds himself mired in as I write this, and you made it through alive. Unemployed, but alive. The fans in San Francisco treated you like an absolute dog. And now the joke’s on us.

Koo-koo-ka-choo Dennis Erickson. Jesus loves you more than you may know.

Whoa, whoa, whoa.

View Comments (2) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

A Must Win?
by Erik Klackner

09.28.05 – It’s hard to imagine a game in Week 4 for a team that went 2-14 last season to carry the magnitude of this week’s game against the Arizona Cardinals, but this game indeed carries that weight. Coming off a bitter loss to the hated Cowboys in which they held the lead for 58 minutes of the contest, the 49ers enter uncharted territory (Mexico City to be precise) as they play the first game in some time that they actually SHOULD win.

The 49ers have played quite well on the season, with the exception of the entire Philadelphia game. Yes, they gave up some leads at home, but this team is still learning how to win, and more importantly, learning how to play with attitude and passion. Meanwhile, Arizona has been clobbered in their opening 3 games, and stands to enter this week minus starting QB Kurt Warner. The writing is on the wall. The writing should be on the wall.

The 49ers MUST win this game.They must win this game to show that they are capable of realizing their own potential, and able to win games against teams that, as unusual as it may sound, are inferior to them. Playing over your head against teams with playoff aspirations (as they did in Weeks 1 and 3) is certainly cause for optimism, but not as much as carrying the confident air that goes with being a superior team. The 49ers will not have many chances to assume this role too often this season, so it is imperative that they do so this week.

Compound that with this being the 49ers only appearance on national television this season, and the game takes on even more significance. Virtually the entire country still views the 49ers as the 2004 version that was clearly the worst team in the NFL. They view the Week 1 victory against the Rams as a failure on the part of the Rams as opposed to success on the part of the 49ers. This is a chance for the 49ers to show the entire country that they have moved on and are an improving, young team that will knock you in the mouth and give you the absolute best shot they have every time out.

I cannot speak for the rest of you, but these first three weeks, I have watched the games operating on the assumption that the 49ers were the inferior team and were going to lose. I thought they would be winless going into the BYE week. But after watching the games unfold, I have a newfound respect for the young players on this team, and the veterans like Bryant Young who are taking to their new positions and schemes nicely. With those types of performances come expectations, and for the first time since sometime in 2003, I fully expect and anticipate the 49ers to win the game this week.

This game could define their season, and seasons to come. Perhaps that seems like an inappropriate amount of weight to give this game, but I do not think so. I think this is the most important type of game of all for a young team looking to return from the bottom of the barrel. Any underdog can rise up on a given day and give a good team all they can handle. But it takes a team with discipline, confidence, and trust (the Mike Nolan buzzword of the week) to embrace the role of ‘favorite’ and run with it. The chance to do this, in these circumstances, for an ESPN Sunday Night audience, is something that the 49ers will not have the chance to do again. This game can be a coming-out party.

But most importantly: This game MUST be a statement game. And that statement MUST be: ‘This isn’t 2004 anymore.’

View Comments (0) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

A Fond Look Back

by Erik Klackner

09.02.05 – The 2005 preseason for the San Francisco 49ers is now in the books, and with it comes the proverbial ‘retrospective’ on the subject. It was an eventful preseason: new coaches, new players, new defensive system, new (old) offensive system, and most importantly, new attitude. All of this was overshadowed by the loss of OL Thomas Herrion, whose presence clearly continues to resonate through the team. That said, the 49ers showed plenty of mental toughness in fighting through adversity and developing themselves, hopefully toward regular season success. Here are my own observations (in order of ‘priority’) of what went down as we steamroll toward week 1:

Causes for Concern

- Run defense. The 49ers gave up an average of 158.5 yards per game on the ground, and 5.0 yards per carry. Is Anthony Adams capable of locking down the interior of the line, freeing up Derek Smith and Jeff Ulbrich? Can Isaac Sopoaga continue to improve his technique enough to become an everydown player?

- Offensive line. With Jeremy Newberry in at C, the line looked much better. Unfortunately, that was for less than 1 quarter in the final game at San Diego. Predominantly without him, the 49ers allowed 14 sacks in 4 games, which would translate to similar numbers to last season’s fiasco. Will Newberry’s knee last the entire season? He is the anchor of the entire offense.

- Kevan Barlow. He picked up right where he left off last season, which is exactly what Mike Nolan did NOT want to see. 24 carries for 76 yards simply will not cut it if the 49ers have any intention of winning the division, which is the stated goal. Frank Gore did not fare much better, averaging 2.9 yards per carry. The rushing attack desperately needs to pick up.

- Special Teams coverage units. The punt coverage in particular has been atrocious, allowing an average return of 11.7 yards, 5th worst in the NFL. Field position could be a real strength for this team with Andy Lee punting, but the coverage units need to step up in a hurry to take advantage.

- Pass defense. The 49ers surrendered the 2nd most passing yards in the league (246.0 per game), despite posting a very respectable 10 sacks in 4 games. The secondary is certainly improving, but will have to take a quantam leap, especially in week 1 facing a team like St. Louis.

Causes for Optimism

- Turnover Margin. The 49ers posted a +7 ratio in takeways/giveaways, which tied for 1st in the NFL. Turnovers generally tell the story of a game, and if they are able to maintain that type of fundamentally sound play, they could be in for a BIG surprise season.

- The Wide Receivers. What was perceived by virtually everyone, including 49ers fans, as a major weakness appears stronger than we all thought. Brandon Lloyd and Arnaz Battle have cemented themselves as the #1 and #2 WRs. Fred Amey had a magnificent preseason. Rashaun Woods, though limited to one game, showed he can contribute significantly.

- The Quarterbacks. It began as a controversy, but was quickly subsided. Tim Rattay played very well in the preseason, posting an impressive 99.4 QB rating (which would have been over 100 if not for the phantom INT call against the Chargers) and showing command of the offense. Alex Smith, after struggling early, showed what he is capable of, leading the game-winning drive against the Titans and throwing a beautiful rollout TD pass at San Diego. Cody Pickett looked very good, leading a 2-minute drive for a TD, and making plenty of big plays. And Ken Dorsey, though limited in his reps, played solid, completing 12-of-17 passes.

- Defensive pressure. As mentioned previously, the 49ers posted 10 sacks, which ranked in the top half of the league, and is a marked improvement from last season. I cannot imagine anything close to all the exotic blitz packages were employed either, meaning the numbers should only get better as the defense grows.

- The rest of the Special Teams. Joe Nedney has been rejuvenated, missing only 1 field goal (a 53-yarder). Andy Lee has been terrific, averaging 41.7 yards per punt, with 5 punts inside the 20-yard line. The return game has been steady, with Fred Amey and Rasheed Marshall both showing glimpses of potential.


Of course, the biggest cause for optimism has been the attitude infusion provided by Mike Nolan and his staff. The 49ers appear hungry, passionate, and enthusiastic, which is something they lacked last season. It sure seems to me that the bleak forecast predicted by most of the media may not come to fruition. Let’s hope the 49ers are able to build on what clearly has been positive preseason momentum.


* A special thanks has to go to Mr Mayhem and Jason77. Without the clips and game footage they uploaded for all of us to use, I would not have been able to see any of these games. Thanks a million gentlemen.

View Comments (0) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

Does it have to be the Whole Playbook?

by Erik Klackner

08.21.05 – After 2 preseason games, the 49ers QB situation continues to be the subject of great debate. This column is no attempt to rehash that debate as both Matt and I have offered opinions on the position and how we would like to see it played out. What this column will attempt to do is figure out a way to get Alex Smith into more of a comfort zone behind center so that the offense can operate smoothly when he is in. My primary solution: simplify the playbook.

After he was drafted and went through a series of mini-camps and offseason training activities, both Mike Nolan and Alex Smith had said that he had been exposed to the entire offensive playbook. I cannot say with any degree of certainty that Smith is in over his head, because he is a very smart man, and a smart football player, which is one of the reasons Nolan was so enamored with him. But I can’t help thinking back to last year, and the play of the #1 pick, Eli Manning.

After beginning the season on the bench behind veteran Kurt Warner, Manning was named the starter for the Week 11 contest against Atlanta. Manning struggled right out of the gate, completing only 39% of his passes with 1 TD and 6 INT, including a miserable 4 of 18 for 27 yards and 2 INTs in a 37-14 drubbing at the hands of the Baltimore Ravens. After that game, Manning went to Coach Tom Coughlin and asked for the playbook to be simplified to the plays he felt comfortable executing. The result? A 1-2 won/loss record, with the 2 losses coming by a combined 5 points to Pittsburgh and Cincinnati, completing 61% of his passes to go with 5 TD and 3 INT.

Couple that with the thought-provoking comment from Urban Meyer about Alex Smith, in which he suggested that Smith would be ‘non-functional’ without a complete mastery of the playbook, and you have to me what appears a simple problem. Alex Smith very well might be trying to out-think himself. And what is the best way to solve a simple problem? With a simple solution. Copy off the guy next to you.

I believe Smith can have success with a simplified playbook, incorporating formations and plays he would feel most comfortable with. Perhaps more use of the shotgun, more designed rollouts, etc. that take advantage of the skills he displayed in college. Couple that with what should be an improved running game featuring Kevan Barlow and Frank Gore, and it could allow for early successes, which would breed confidence in not only Smith, but the team as a whole.

Early returns say Smith appears to have some pieces around him that are certainly better than many ”experts” initially predicted; Brandon Lloyd has progressed rapidly under the tutelage of Jerry Sullivan, Gore and Barlow both ran well when sharing carries for a short stint in the 2nd quarter against Denver, and Eric Johnson, the 49ers biggest offensive threat last season, should be available by the time the regular season rolls around. The offensive line, while struggling early in yesterday’s game, played much better during Tim Rattay’s appearance in the game, despite playing against virtually the exact same defense. It seems to me that the offensive personnel feel more comfortable with Rattay right now, and I think that is because Rattay has a clear understanding of the offense and operates it smoothly, and the offense thrives off that confidence.

I see no reason to think Alex Smith could not develop similar rapport with the offense quickly, if the playbook were simplified. If the 49ers organization is intent on starting Smith at QB this season, a simplified playbook is the best way to ensure that he enjoys early success, and in turn, that the team enjoys success.

View Comments (0) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

by Erik Klackner
08.14.05 – In the wake of the San Francisco 49ers first preseason game of the Mike Nolan/Alex Smith era, the questions that had been kept silent for two weeks of training camp have resurfaced.

Smith had taken the majority of the 1st team reps, leaving Tim Rattay to work with the 2nd string offense, all leading to the game against Oakland. The results were predictable, but nevertheless eye-opening. Smith appeared nervous, as all rookies do, and struggled to a 3 of 9 for 25 yards and one sack. Rattay played like the veteran that he is, completing 6 of 8 passes for 103 yards and 2 touchdowns. Is a full fledged QB controversy looming? Nolan doesn’t seem to think so. ‘We will more than likely maintain the same structure we’ve had in place in training camp. That’s no reflection of how anyone played; it’ss just going well with that structure,’ he said after the game.

It is abundantly clear to anyone with eyes that the 49ers desperately want Smith to start the season as the #1 QB, and you can hardly blame them. They need to sell tickets. They need to restore pride in the franchise. And most importantly, they need to see what $24 million of guaranteed money got them. All perfectly valid reasons to place Smith in the line of fire and let him learn on the job. The question I have is: does winning games in 2005 factor into the equation?

Clearly one game is not completely indicative of the entire situation, but it seems numbingly apparent that the best chance the 49ers have to win this season is with Tim Rattay as the starting QB. His strong but brief performance in the game reminded me of why I was so strongly in favor of him to begin with, however fleeting due to the circumstances. He moved the offense efficiently and calmly, as a veteran should. He seems to me to be the best QB option we have this season. Therein lies the dilemma.

This is Alex Smith’s team. It will be Alex Smith’s team for the foreseeable future. And Tim Rattay will either be relegated to being a well-paid backup, or more likely, the QB of another team. The question becomes rather simple, and yet so complex: Should the 49ers sacrifice the potential successes of 2005 for the potential successes of 2008 and beyond?

My simple yet so complex answer is to have your cake and eat it to. Let Tim Rattay be your QB in 2005. Let Alex Smith be your QB in 2006 and beyond. The argument has been made that it is better for Smith to play immediately, take his lumps, and grow as quickly as possible. I respect that position, and don’t necessarily disagree with the premise, but I think it fails to take into account past history as much as it seems to factor it in. Beginning with Peyton Manning in 1998, a total of 22 QBs have been taken in the 1st round. What follows is a VERY rough breakdown of whether they played right away (a minimum of 200 attempts in their rookie season) or sat on the bench for a period of time (less than 200 attempts in their rookie season):

QBs who played immediately
Peyton Manning, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Donovan McNabb, Cade McNown, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Patrick Ramsey, Byron Leftwich, Kyle Boller, Ben Roethlisberger

QB’s Who Sat on the Bench
Akili Smith, Daunte Culpepper, Chad Pennington, Michael Vick, Carson Palmer, Rex Grossman, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, JP Losman

What does that breakdown suggest? To me, it suggests that either option is a reasonable one. I firmly believe Smith has the tools to be a great QB in the NFL. And I firmly believe that he could play this season and take his lumps like Peyton Manning and learn from them and mature quickly. But with a quality veteran option in Tim Rattay available to play this season, I also believe Smith could benefit from sitting for a season and learning the nuances of the NFL from the sidelines before coming in next season as the featured QB, in the manner of Daunte Culpepper, Carson Palmer, and Michael Vick.

So which will the 49ers choose? I imagine they’ll pick door number one, and put Smith in the driver’s seat of the franchise from day 1, even if it means a couple minor accidents and traffic violations along the way. Which should they choose? I think they should pick door number two, and let Smith have a learner’s permit, only operating the ‘vehicle’ with a licensed driver present. As much as the sight of your #1 overall selection playing every week will help bring fans back into the fold, winning games will bring them back quicker.

View Comments (0) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post

by Erik Klackner

06.10.05—In the wake of the San Francisco 49ers Training Video fiasco, the herd of cattle that is political correctness has been given a loud "YEE-HAW" and begun its latest stampede down our throats. And for what? A 15-minute video with a few cheesy stereotypes? I’m completely baffled by the reaction to this tape, and apparently, so are the 49ers, because I have never seen any organization (regardless of field) in scramble mode at the pace Dr. York and company are currently maintaining. Apologizing to this group, setting up diversity training with that group, taking suggestions from another. Over the tape?

Let me get this straight (no pun intended): an Asian man willing to take part in a skit where he pokes fun at the stereotype that some Asians struggle with the letters L and R is racist. Kirk Reynolds recommending to Jeff Ulbrich that he "not drop the soap" is homophobic? Those jokes have been around since the dawn of bad comedy, and they are as ‘not all that funny’ now as they were then. And yet, you would have thought that they kidnapped a small boy, set him on fire, and rolled him down Lombard Street the way people reacted.

Stereotypes are what they are; every group has them. I saw a commercial just yesterday for a beer company, with a white guy dancing rather clumsily, before being handed a beer from the spokesman, and the catchy slogan for the ad was, "Helping white people dance for over 70 years." Now, I’m a white guy, and I actually dance reasonably well. Can someone explain to me why I’m not supposed to be offended by this? A national commercial? But a video made to be seen by a PARTICULAR audience that contains similar stereotypes about other groups is grounds for what we’ve seen in the last week? Is it because San Francisco has a large Asian population and and a large gay population? America has a large "white guy" population, so what exactly is the difference? I’ll be waiting by the phone for someone to answer that.

Or, I can answer it myself: discrimination happens to individuals, not groups. No matter what group you associate yourself with, that group is going to have something said about it that can be considered disagreeable. But until you experience it personally by the party in question, leave it alone. The beer company didn’t send me an e-mail saying "you can’t dance because you’re white." They made a commercial playing off the stereotype that white people generally dance poorly. Kirk Reynolds made a video playing off the stereotype that Asian people sometimes substitute the letter L for R, and the stereotype that sometimes in prison, men will resort to homosexual activity for a number of reasons., which, whether we want to admit it or not, happens enough for it to be considered a stereotype. It does not mean you have to believe the stereotypes; I’ve known plenty of Asian people who did not fit the stereotype portrayed in the video, just like I can dance. So, until a member of the 49ers organization personally calls you on the phone and insults you or your group, do what Paul McCartney’s mom always told him, and "Let it Be.

View Comments (0) RSS Feed for Comments on this Post
print