<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No to Brooks, but Yes to Dixon</title>
	<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/</link>
	<description>Feed Your Niner Addiction</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: baaqi</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5281</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:25:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5281</guid>
					<description>Damn nobody never answered my question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Damn nobody never answered my question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HB</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5231</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:10:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5231</guid>
					<description>You CANNOT COACH TEAM SPEED. The jim Maxwells and other fringe players will always be left on the side to make room for younger faster players who can play. Only if they really can play. Derek Smith is not the fastest but is a PLAYER. Saleem Rasheed better pack a bag </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You <span class="caps">CANNOT COACH TEAM SPEED</span>. The jim Maxwells and other fringe players will always be left on the side to make room for younger faster players who can play. Only if they really can play. Derek Smith is not the fastest but is a <span class="caps">PLAYER</span>. Saleem Rasheed better pack a bag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BurlyD_83</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5230</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:38:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5230</guid>
					<description>I don't have a problem with the 49ers signing Dixon at all... As long as there is room on the roster, I say bring guys in to compete, it can only help!

Above, there was a link posted w/information about this player. Here is a quote from that information...

&quot;Dixon plays with good confidence and is not afraid to mix it up in the trenches, but also comes with glowing praise from both coaching staffs due to his work ethic. He might not have the major college experience of A.J. Hawk, but one look at his production and athletic agility tests scores and you can see that someone will unearth a tremendous, but raw talent with a blank slate to mold within&quot;

ANYTIME You have a chance to &quot;Unearth a tremendous talent&quot; I say you take the chance everytime!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with the 49ers signing Dixon at all&#8230; As long as there is room on the roster, I say bring guys in to compete, it can only help!</p>
	<p>Above, there was a link posted w/information about this player. Here is a quote from that information&#8230;</p>
	<p>&#8220;Dixon plays with good confidence and is not afraid to mix it up in the trenches, but also comes with glowing praise from both coaching staffs due to his work ethic. He might not have the major college experience of A.J. Hawk, but one look at his production and athletic agility tests scores and you can see that someone will unearth a tremendous, but raw talent with a blank slate to mold within&#8221;</p>
	<p><span class="caps">ANYTIME </span>You have a chance to &#8220;Unearth a tremendous talent&#8221; I say you take the chance everytime<img src="!" alt="" border="0" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: syvideoguy</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5229</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:29:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5229</guid>
					<description>looks like a practice squad this year, NFLE next year, maybe, just maybe a spot the year after. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>looks like a practice squad this year, <span class="caps">NFLE</span> next year, maybe, just maybe a spot the year after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: draper</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5228</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:20:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5228</guid>
					<description>lol mike... but seriously, how tall is this guy? I mean, how much space does the depth chart hold for back up LBs?? Isn't Parys Haralson a rather long term project too???  Corey Smith?? Manny Lawson? Plus that Maxwell guy who everyone was hyped on at the end of last year. 

so yeah.... more camp fodder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>lol mike&#8230; but seriously, how tall is this guy? I mean, how much space does the depth chart hold for back up LBs?? Isn&#8217;t Parys Haralson a rather long term project too???  Corey Smith?? Manny Lawson? Plus that Maxwell guy who everyone was hyped on at the end of last year.</p>
	<p>so yeah&#8230;. more camp fodder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike C.</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5226</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:50:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5226</guid>
					<description>Actually, he is 6'0&quot;, 40.67lbs, runs a 3.32, and benchs 4,217lbs.  His pro day on the moon was only attended by a Hutchinson Comm. Coll. science Professor.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Actually, he is 6&#8217;0&#8221;, 40.67lbs, runs a 3.32, and benchs 4,217lbs.  His pro day on the moon was only attended by a Hutchinson Comm. Coll. science Professor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: EezyE</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5225</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:30:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5225</guid>
					<description>A 4.42 second 40 time? It just keeps getting lower and lower doesn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">A 4</span>.42 second 40 time? It just keeps getting lower and lower doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HB</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5224</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:44:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5224</guid>
					<description>Few athletes in the draft possess the athletic ability Dixon displays -- running a 4.42-second 40-yard dash, with a 44-inch vertical jump, 49-inch triple jump and a 465-pound bench press. That leaping ability was evident as he blocked ten kicks in two seasons in the junior college ranks.
&quot;David is the best I've seen,&quot; said Blue Dragon head coach Craig Jersild. &quot;Athletically, there's no one who compares to him at this level, and not too many at the next. He's 6-2, 245, runs a 4.4 in his blue jeans, benches whatever you put on the bar, and has a vertical jump of 44 inches, and he's a football player

http://www2.jsonline.com/packer/insider/draft/2006/biosdetail.aspx?fname=David&amp;amp;lname=Dixon&amp;amp;pos=LB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Few athletes in the draft possess the athletic ability Dixon displays&#8212;running a 4.42-second 40-yard dash, with a 44-inch vertical jump, 49-inch triple jump and a 465-pound bench press. That leaping ability was evident as he blocked ten kicks in two seasons in the junior college ranks.<br />
&#8220;David is the best I&#8217;ve seen,&#8221; said Blue Dragon head coach Craig Jersild. &#8220;Athletically, there&#8217;s no one who compares to him at this level, and not too many at the next. He&#8217;s 6-2, 245, runs a 4.4 in his blue jeans, benches whatever you put on the bar, and has a vertical jump of 44 inches, and he&#8217;s a football player</p>
	<p><a href='http://www2.jsonline.com/packer/insider/draft/2006/biosdetail.aspx?fname=David&#038;lname=Dixon&#038;pos=LB' rel='nofollow'>http://www2.jsonline.com/packer/insider/draft/2006/biosdetail.aspx?fname=David&#038;lname=Dixon&#038;pos=LB</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GREG</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5223</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:13:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5223</guid>
					<description>THATS RIGHT, IT WONT COST ANYTHING IN NEXT YEARS DRAFT BECAUSE THEY DIDNT DRAFT HIM JUST SIGNED HIM UFA..ANOTHER PROJECT STILL BUT WHAT THE HELL HOPEFULLY IT WILL TURN OUT..SF 49ERS SCHOOL OF FOOTBALL..DONT KNOW HOW TO PLAY FOOTBALL ITS OK WE WILL GIVE YOU A SHOT HOW ABOUT A THREE YEAR DEAL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">THATS RIGHT</span>, IT <span class="caps">WONT COST ANYTHING IN NEXT YEARS DRAFT BECAUSE THEY DIDNT DRAFT HIM JUST SIGNED HIM UFA</span>..ANOTHER <span class="caps">PROJECT STILL BUT WHAT THE HELL HOPEFULLY IT WILL TURN OUT</span>..SF 49ERS <span class="caps">SCHOOL OF FOOTBALL</span>..DONT <span class="caps">KNOW HOW TO PLAY FOOTBALL ITS OK WE WILL GIVE YOU A SHOT HOW ABOUT A THREE YEAR DEAL</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ed gein</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5222</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:04:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/14/no-to-brooks-but-yes-to-dixon/#comment-5222</guid>
					<description>mike
 i think it wont cost us anything in next years draft cuz we will sign him as a UFA, i believe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>mike</p>
	<p> i think it wont cost us anything in next years draft cuz we will sign him as a <span class="caps">UFA</span>, i believe
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
