Update: – Brooks to the Bengals in the 3rd.
The draft order for the 2006 Supplemental Draft is set, the 49ers get the first pick. The draft started at 10:00am PST this morning. No word yet on if the Niners have selected Ahmad Brooks.
Word is that the 1st round is over and no one picked anyone.
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/07/13/niners-get-1st-pick-in-supp/trackback/
RSS feed for responses to this post. 
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> , 'Smart' Smileys.
ed gein said:
when is the supp draft over? what time?
9 mins after the fact.anyone think we will get brooks in the 3rd?
Jason said:
do you have a link???
11 mins after the fact.iamtheman698 said:
Yeah, I knew we wouldn’t get brooks, Nolan wouldn’t give up a high draft pick.
27 mins after the fact.Will said:
So the Bengals got Brooks?..Or is he still available
27 mins after the fact.Ted Bundy said:
Yeah, Nolan isn’t the type of guy to take risks.
36 mins after the fact.CaseyJames said:
Eh, he wasnt worth a 3rd round pick. I’ll be satisfied with whomever we get next year.
57 mins after the fact.Whatever said:
Yeah, that’s it CaseyJames. A guy who would’ve been a top 10 pick if he didn’t do drugs isn’t worth a 3rd round pick. Even if we take some total bust next year, you’ll be satisfied.
Seriously, you suck at life. Get lost.
2 hours after the fact.Niner said:
Far as I can remember, Nolans only third round pick that has played a season is Frank Gore. Im satisfied with that pick, seriously.
2 hours after the fact.matt said:
“Whatever” seems to think that personal attacks validate his arguments.. I tend to think that those attacks make him and his argument seem less intelligent. Furthermore, as I have confidence in Nolan and the rest of the staff in making the correct decision, I have no problem with not getting Brooks. Would have been nice, but I think there were too many question marks..
2 hours after the fact.kookie819 said:
I agree with matt. He would’ve added talent to our team… Chris Henry+Thurman+Ahmed Brooks= The future of the Bengals… lol…
4 hours after the fact.ed gein said:
kookie819 said:
Henry+Thurman+Ahmed Brooks= The future of the Bengals
that what right there won’t be the starting lineup, that is the suspect lineup!
4 hours after the fact.steve said:
kookie819 said:
I agree with matt. He would’ve added talent to our team… Chris Henry+Thurman+Ahmed Brooks= The future of the Bengals… lol…
don’t forget…A.J. Nicolson, Forrest Rocker..already in trouble with the law…go Bengals
!!
4 hours after the fact.Eric said:
You guys can laugh at the Bengals all you want, it might help you sleep at night. But they were a playoff team last year. We were not. Until we get there, I don’t see us Niner fans having any room to laugh. And don’t bring up the past. I live in Nebraska. I have to listen to Husker fans talk about the storied past all day long. Doesn’t mean shit, what have you done for me lately??? Niners 4-12, Bengals – Playoffs.
I didn’t want Brooks. Like I said earlier. We are still using Tide with Bleach to get the Shit stains off this team left by Terrell Owens. Nolan is obviously looking for character. Beasley is gone (remember him jawing off about Barlow?? Those 2 didn’t get along). Nolan wants winners with character. Brooks didn’t fit the mold.
Oh, and quit running your fucking mouth about other people’s post. That means you WHATEVER. Everyone has their own opinion. Don’t like it, don’t read it. Like my opinion is your ignorant punk who knows nothing about the Niners. So you get lost.
4 hours after the fact.ed gein said:
damn eric, a little harsh, no?
5 hours after the fact.well i guess someone had to tell him, but say what you want about us and the bengals, that shit was funny, unlike most, i have a sense of humor, remember its not the off-field issues that took them to the play-offs, it was their on-field play that did, so its ok to laugh, man! i truly believe in nolan and everything he is about, in time we will back as contendors, but right now, im laughing at the bengals off-field issues and respecting and admiring their on-field play!
steve said:
Eric, seriously, i think we all little disappointed that the Bengle use a 3rd to snatch him..so for that us 9ers fan just having little fun with the Bangle
5 hours after the fact.Whatever said:
What exactly has Nolan proven other than that he can go 4-12? I don’t trust anyone who passes on taking a top 10 talent with a 3rd round pick.
6 hours after the fact.CaseyJames said:
Experts said Brooks was worth a 6th rounder for a reason. How many troubled college stars actually make it big in the NFL?? I honestly can’t think of one. Marcus Vick had more talent than Brooks but he didn’t even get drafted.
6 hours after the fact.Trenton said:
Marcus does not have more talent the Brooks you know Im kind of torn on weather or not we should have takin him but I have seen both these guys play a couple times and Marcus doesnt compare to Brooks
And he is a top 5 talent he prolly would have went to GB and we could have choose between VD and AJ Hawk. But Not one coach or GM thought that he was worth a 1st or 2nd round thats 64 of the smartest people in FOOTBALL!
9 hours after the fact.matt said:
“Whatever said:
What exactly has Nolan proven other than that he can go 4-12? I don’t trust anyone who passes on taking a top 10 talent with a 3rd round pick. ”
I guess my response would be… number 1, Nolan has proved he can go 4-12 with the team with a young team that with its injuries could have arguably went 1-16. And number 2, from everything I’ve read about him and from what I’ve seen of him, i’ve been impressed. That being said, you’re right – he hasn’t proven anything. All successful people at one point or another hadn’t proven anything. Its how they work and handle themselves up until they “prove themselves” that defines them.
11 hours after the fact.JJP said:
I am sure the Bengals gave up the 3rd because otherwise we would have offered one of the 4th rounders we had. Also, nobody knows how teams will finish in 2007. Say the Bengals have a bad season and that 3rd rounder is high (this year they had a low 3rd rounder). For us giving up a third was more risky given our record these past years.
14 hours after the fact.ed gein said:
hey matt
matt said: young team that with its injuries could have arguably went 1-16
i think you mean 1-15, right? i dont wanna bag on you if its just a typo, cuz i totally agree!
15 hours after the fact.Eric said:
First of all, the Bengals used a 3rd round pick BECAUSE, coincidentally, Thurman is now suspended for the first 4 games of the season for failing the substance abuse policy. Brooks is an insurance pick.
Second of all, what has Nolan proven. Let’s see, he’s had 1 draft and 1 year to prove himself. Let’s see, if the Cowboys had given Troy Aikman 1 year, he would have been cut. It took Bill Cowher how long to get to the playoffs?? Bill Parcells went like 5-11 his first year with Dallas. It takes more than 1 year moron. Whatever needs to go. Go to amazon.com and buy the book “NFL fan for Dummies”.
And although i’m not a Brooks fan, somebody asked about a college player with off field problems making it in the NFL. Ummm, Randy Moss had a 2 problems at Marshall and was almost kicked off the team at one point. Just and FYI
!
21 hours after the fact.Niner said:
Im sure a lot of these fake ass fans on here, had it been 1979, wouldve probly said something like “What has Walsh proven, nothing other than he can go 2-14”
23 hours after the fact.mike said:
Good job of thinking about taking on this LB with nothing but trouble off field. Nolan is really getting good at picking players that a good on the field and out of trouble off the field.
1 day after the fact.matt said:
Ed gein,
Yes, that was a typo. My apologies – cookouts & beer are the wrong prelude to blogging…..
1 day after the fact.