<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED Mock Draft 4/20</title>
	<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/</link>
	<description>Feed Your Niner Addiction</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: theraven</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1790</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:11:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1790</guid>
					<description>Actually Huff has had his own fantastic workouts as well. He had a solid 40 time and good workouts.

Watching him fly around the field at safety making plays is a thing of beauty, and he is very good in man coverage so he can play CB as well. He could be our new age Ronnie Lott.

Either way we can't go wrong with either Huff or Davis, so I wouldn't stress too much about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Actually Huff has had his own fantastic workouts as well. He had a solid 40 time and good workouts.</p>
	<p>Watching him fly around the field at safety making plays is a thing of beauty, and he is very good in man coverage so he can play CB as well. He could be our new age Ronnie Lott.</p>
	<p>Either way we can&#8217;t go wrong with either Huff or Davis, so I wouldn&#8217;t stress too much about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shane</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1749</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:02:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1749</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't be &quot;crushed&quot; at all with Huff. He fills a great need, and before VD had his fantastic workouts and the hype started, Huff seemed a good choice.

Especially 'cause of his love of pancakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;crushed&#8221; at all with Huff. He fills a great need, and before VD had his fantastic workouts and the hype started, Huff seemed a good choice.</p>
	<p>Especially &#8216;cause of his love of pancakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ChrisSooner49er</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1728</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:48:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1728</guid>
					<description>I like the 1st day picks but feel the WR and FB picks might be filled best by Mike Hass and J.D. Runnels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I like the 1st day picks but feel the WR and FB picks might be filled best by Mike Hass and J.D. Runnels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AnteaterCharger</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1724</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:06:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1724</guid>
					<description>You guys made a great move grabbing that extra #1, especially because you took it off the broncos hands which pleases me greatly. As a note, Watkins will not last til the end of the third</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You guys made a great move grabbing that extra #1, especially because you took it off the broncos hands which pleases me greatly. As a note, Watkins will not last til the end of the third</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MJ</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1634</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:22:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1634</guid>
					<description>Nice mock draft. Sounds great to me. I just wonder, do any of these mock drafts reach the niners club? Cuz they have disappointed me this offseason with the exception of adding Larry Allen. If we end up getting Huff I will be crushed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice mock draft. Sounds great to me. I just wonder, do any of these mock drafts reach the niners club? Cuz they have disappointed me this offseason with the exception of adding Larry Allen. If we end up getting Huff I will be crushed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1580</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:45:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1580</guid>
					<description>420 holla!!!!ya'll know what im talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>420 holla<img src="!" alt="" border="0" />!ya&#8217;ll know what im talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1579</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:37:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1579</guid>
					<description>but some mock have Lawson as high as #12 in the first...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>but some mock have Lawson as high as #12 in the first&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt K</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1578</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:32:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1578</guid>
					<description>I think Lawson is great but if we moved up in the draft for him then it was a mistake, odds are decent he will be around in the early 2nd round.  I've looked a several mock drafts and most have him in the second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think Lawson is great but if we moved up in the draft for him then it was a mistake, odds are decent he will be around in the early 2nd round.  I&#8217;ve looked a several mock drafts and most have him in the second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: J&gt;a</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1577</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:27:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1577</guid>
					<description>6 &amp;amp; 7th round needs plenty of work... I mean it... really...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>6 &#038; 7th round needs plenty of work&#8230; I mean it&#8230; really&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Smackizzle</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1576</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:09:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/04/20/updated-mock-draft-420/#comment-1576</guid>
					<description>.....uhh they've been in a 3-4 since nolan took over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>.....uhh they&#8217;ve been in a 3-4 since nolan took over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
