<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harris Trade Rumors</title>
	<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/</link>
	<description>Feed Your Niner Addiction</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: derrick</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-4047</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 14:28:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-4047</guid>
					<description>we might be able to to trade harris because we have smiley and bass but not for draft picks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>we might be able to to trade harris because we have smiley and bass but not for draft picks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: derrick</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-4046</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 14:28:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-4046</guid>
					<description>we might be able to to trade harris because we have smiley and bass but not for draft picks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>we might be able to to trade harris because we have smiley and bass but not for draft picks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-777</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:32:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-777</guid>
					<description>If we can trade Harris for a first day draft pick then go for it. I suspect he will lose his starting job to Adam Snyder anyway.

As for the debate on drafting Ferguson or AJ Hawk:
 Listen, I would love to have a badass linebacker to replace Julian Peterson. But the fact is that decent to great linebackers can be had in free agency. If Ferguson is the next Orlando Pace, how often do you get a shot at a player like that? Its great that the 49ers signed Larry Allen but he is a short term fix (2 yr contract, the end of which he will have played 14 seasons). If our coaching staff is sure that Ferguson will be the next Orlando pace then we simply must draft him.
Jennings, Allen, Newberry, Smiley, Ferguson
with Hietman the center if newberry goes down, and  Synder the top backup at OT.


If dabrickshaw is off the board at #6 and AJ hawk is still around then we take Aj hawk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If we can trade Harris for a first day draft pick then go for it. I suspect he will lose his starting job to Adam Snyder anyway.</p>
	<p>As for the debate on drafting Ferguson or <span class="caps">AJ </span>Hawk:</p>
	<p> Listen, I would love to have a badass linebacker to replace Julian Peterson. But the fact is that decent to great linebackers can be had in free agency. If Ferguson is the next Orlando Pace, how often do you get a shot at a player like that? Its great that the 49ers signed Larry Allen but he is a short term fix (2 yr contract, the end of which he will have played 14 seasons). If our coaching staff is sure that Ferguson will be the next Orlando pace then we simply must draft him.<br />
Jennings, Allen, Newberry, Smiley, Ferguson<br />
with Hietman the center if newberry goes down, and  Synder the top backup at OT.</p>
	<p>If dabrickshaw is off the board at #6 and AJ hawk is still around then we take Aj hawk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-772</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:30:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-772</guid>
					<description>It is kind of crazy to get rid of Harris because of some penalties.  I sure didn't like him starting last year, but he is a very good backup and still might develop into a good starter - he's only 23, 24 yo.  If you get rid of Harris you're likely do get a lot worse at backup.  Anthony Clement, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It is kind of crazy to get rid of Harris because of some penalties.  I sure didn&#8217;t like him starting last year, but he is a very good backup and still might develop into a good starter &#8211; he&#8217;s only 23, 24 yo.  If you get rid of Harris you&#8217;re likely do get a lot worse at backup.  Anthony Clement, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-757</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:40:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-757</guid>
					<description>Packers | Team to no longer in the running to sign R. Smith
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:18:25 -0800

Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers are no longer in the running to sign free agent LB Raonall Smith (Vikings).

So now its an NFC West battle.  Come on 49ers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Packers | Team to no longer in the running to sign R. Smith<br />
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:18:25 -0800</p>
	<p>Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers are no longer in the running to sign free agent <span class="caps">LB </span>Raonall Smith (Vikings).</p>
	<p>So now its an <span class="caps">NFC </span>West battle.  Come on 49ers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-756</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:59:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-756</guid>
					<description>Yeah you have a good point about that 70yd td run that was called back.  That would have knocked Barlows avg well above 3.4...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah you have a good point about that 70yd td run that was called back.  That would have knocked Barlows avg well above 3.4&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tom</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-754</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:23:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-754</guid>
					<description>nothing slips your mind does it billyjoejimbob.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>nothing slips your mind does it billyjoejimbob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BillyJoeJimBob</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-752</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:18:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-752</guid>
					<description>ANd another thing, Barlow had a 60 yard td reception and a 70 yard td run called back last year due to that quality individual known as Kwame Harris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>ANd another thing, Barlow had a 60 yard td reception and a 70 yard td run called back last year due to that quality individual known as Kwame Harris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BillyJoeJimBob</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-751</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:15:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-751</guid>
					<description>Barlow will be fine this year.  He didn't just forget how to run these last two years.  The o-line sucked and Mike McCarthy is an idiot and didn't know how to utilize his skills to run him.  Barlow is not a hit the hole type of back, he's a back that needs to get outside on sweeps and counters.  Norv Turner does have a clue and will know how to utilize him.  With all that being said, they still may trade him or cut his ass.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Barlow will be fine this year.  He didn&#8217;t just forget how to run these last two years.  The o-line sucked and Mike McCarthy is an idiot and didn&#8217;t know how to utilize his skills to run him.  Barlow is not a hit the hole type of back, he&#8217;s a back that needs to get outside on sweeps and counters.  Norv Turner does have a clue and will know how to utilize him.  With all that being said, they still may trade him or cut his ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-750</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:43:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/29/harris-trade-rumors/#comment-750</guid>
					<description>Barlow will surprise this year because he wont have to search 4 holes. Barlow will be a good changeup for Gore or Hicks, Barlow will be big this year for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Barlow will surprise this year because he wont have to search 4 holes. Barlow will be a good changeup for Gore or Hicks, Barlow will be big this year for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
