Comments on: Update on Newberry http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/ Feed Your Niner Addiction Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:55:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: Anonymous http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-3656 Sat, 06 May 2006 21:07:02 +0100 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-3656 accelerators!boundless bulldogs commissions burrow dogging accelerators!boundless bulldogs commissions burrow dogging

]]> by: josh http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-631 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:31:32 +0100 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-631 Dave I see your point. The problem with our defense is there is not that one guy who you think of when you talk about our D. With any of the top d's in the league a certain player registers with you, like the Bears (Urlacher), Dolphins (Thomas), Steelers (porter), 49ers (Young). That is my point, the niners have somebody but he is getting close to leaving and they need that impact player on d to take them to the next level (or first). Dont get me wrong I think Davis would be huge for us, but I believe the team would be better served with AJ and Byrd. Dave I see your point. The problem with our defense is there is not that one guy who you think of when you talk about our D. With any of the top d’s in the league a certain player registers with you, like the Bears (Urlacher), Dolphins (Thomas), Steelers (porter), 49ers (Young). That is my point, the niners have somebody but he is getting close to leaving and they need that impact player on d to take them to the next level (or first). Dont get me wrong I think Davis would be huge for us, but I believe the team would be better served with AJ and Byrd.

]]> by: Darrel http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-630 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:02:42 +0100 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-630 It's not a knock on Hawk( he runs a 4.3 with a nose 4 the ball), it's just VD would help our young QB and O so much, on top of providing insurance 4 EJ. But no doubt about there r some real good ball players we r gonna have to pass on. Let's hope we make the right choice(the DUKE)!!! It’s not a knock on Hawk( he runs a 4.3 with a nose 4 the ball), it’s just VD would help our young QB and O so much, on top of providing insurance 4 EJ. But no doubt about there r some real good ball players we r gonna have to pass on. Let’s hope we make the right choice(the DUKE)

]]> by: Cuzo P http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-627 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:05:18 +0100 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-627 newberry bak will definitely help us out on the line and give smith a lil more time in the pocket. But we still have question marks on defense and we need to get an lb. newberry bak will definitely help us out on the line and give smith a lil more time in the pocket. But we still have question marks on defense and we need to get an lb.

]]> by: Dave http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-626 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:42:49 +0100 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-626 See I don't agree. I think Davis is leaps and bounds bette than any other TE out there and possibly any other TE even in the NFL. Time will tell obviously, but I don't think Hawk is all that much more impressive or better than most of the linebackers in the draft. Sure he's the best one, but I don't feel he's that much better than the LBs who will be drafted after him. Hawk also isn't really playing a position thats has game changing ability. Sure he's a good player, but if we need someone to come up with a big play, how big of a play can he come up with in a situation like that. Davis has game breaking abilities. He's also another option for Smith to throw to. He'll help draw some coverage away from Bryant. And if he turns out like we expect one day he could be drawing double coverage (consistently). That'll open up our passing game more & our running game. It also makes every player around him all that much better. Offense is different from defense in that regard. A play maker like Davis really changes things up, where as on defense the entire defense still needs to be solid. Defense is more about not having any weak links. See I don’t agree. I think Davis is leaps and bounds bette than any other TE out there and possibly any other TE even in the NFL. Time will tell obviously, but I don’t think Hawk is all that much more impressive or better than most of the linebackers in the draft. Sure he’s the best one, but I don’t feel he’s that much better than the LBs who will be drafted after him.

Hawk also isn’t really playing a position thats has game changing ability. Sure he’s a good player, but if we need someone to come up with a big play, how big of a play can he come up with in a situation like that.

Davis has game breaking abilities. He’s also another option for Smith to throw to. He’ll help draw some coverage away from Bryant. And if he turns out like we expect one day he could be drawing double coverage (consistently). That’ll open up our passing game more & our running game. It also makes every player around him all that much better.

Offense is different from defense in that regard. A play maker like Davis really changes things up, where as on defense the entire defense still needs to be solid. Defense is more about not having any weak links.

]]> by: josh http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-625 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:13:54 +0100 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-625 I have sort of the the same feeling, but with that being said I wouldnt be upset if they went with Hawk, a guy who has done well his whole time at the Ohio State and picked up a TE like Pope, Byrd or Fasano in the second round. I read today that Johnson is on the field so that is a plus. I just think that a guy like Davis is a gamble because there is a lot of really good TEs this year. I think the combo of Hawk and Byrd would be better than Davis and some other LB. But thats just me. I have sort of the the same feeling, but with that being said I wouldnt be upset if they went with Hawk, a guy who has done well his whole time at the Ohio State and picked up a TE like Pope, Byrd or Fasano in the second round. I read today that Johnson is on the field so that is a plus. I just think that a guy like Davis is a gamble because there is a lot of really good TEs this year. I think the combo of Hawk and Byrd would be better than Davis and some other LB. But thats just me.

]]> by: Dave http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-623 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:06:17 +0100 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-623 I agree with Nolan having something up his sleeve. Honestly, the guy is so hard to read. Even as a huge niner fan who follows the organization pretty closely, I feel like I have no idea which direction we'll go come draft day. I believe we'll make smart moves, but if someone told me Mario, VD, D'Brick, Hawk, and Huff were all availible at the 6th pick I wouldn't even know who we'd pick. I don't even know how far we'd consider trading down. I mean personally I (realistically) want VD. I also would be hesitant to trade down. But I just have no idea what Nolan has up his sleeve. I agree with Nolan having something up his sleeve. Honestly, the guy is so hard to read. Even as a huge niner fan who follows the organization pretty closely, I feel like I have no idea which direction we’ll go come draft day. I believe we’ll make smart moves, but if someone told me Mario, VD, D’Brick, Hawk, and Huff were all availible at the 6th pick I wouldn’t even know who we’d pick. I don’t even know how far we’d consider trading down.

I mean personally I (realistically) want VD. I also would be hesitant to trade down. But I just have no idea what Nolan has up his sleeve.

]]> by: Darrel http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-622 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:05:43 +0000 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-622 Now thats pure genious P'Nelly, but we gotta get VD. Now thats pure genious P’Nelly, but we gotta get VD.

]]> by: P'Nelly http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-620 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:35:48 +0000 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-620 If D'brick is there at #6, teams will be lining up to trade for our pick. If we could trade down just a little and pick up a 2nd or 3 rounder and still get VD....that would be butterlicious! If D’brick is there at #6, teams will be lining up to trade for our pick. If we could trade down just a little and pick up a 2nd or 3 rounder and still get VD….that would be butterlicious!

]]> by: Darrel http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-618 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:22:20 +0000 http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/24/update-on-newberry/#comment-618 This much we all agree on, we're gettin a stud come draft time. Instant impact is precisely what we need. This much we all agree on, we’re gettin a stud come draft time. Instant impact is precisely what we need.

]]>