<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro Day: Michael Huff</title>
	<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/</link>
	<description>Feed Your Niner Addiction</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: stoney</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-582</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 06:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-582</guid>
					<description>Stay away from Huff #6 is to high.  Hawk or Davis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Stay away from Huff #6 is to high.  Hawk or Davis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-574</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-574</guid>
					<description>We cant let VD slip 2 ARI or STL, besides a 2 TE package sounds enticing. Antonio Gates II</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We cant let VD slip 2 <span class="caps">ARI</span> or <span class="caps">STL</span>, besides a 2 TE package sounds enticing. Antonio Gates II</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-564</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-564</guid>
					<description>This is one of the deepest TE classes in years.  Davis has the potential to be a superstar, but the Niners could pick up a very good TE in the second round.  I think they will go with Huff, and possibly pick up Fasano (Notre Dame) in the second round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is one of the deepest TE classes in years.  Davis has the potential to be a superstar, but the Niners could pick up a very good TE in the second round.  I think they will go with Huff, and possibly pick up Fasano (Notre Dame) in the second round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: P'Nelly</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-529</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-529</guid>
					<description>If 4 int's in 4 years is the case, then I'd pass on him at #6.  Nothing improves your DB's more than having a pass rush....trading down and getting Broderick Bunkley as a DE in the 3-4 might be a good call.  B.Y. is not getting any younger....and if Bunkley's not around Chad Greenway would be solid as a OLB.  I think both could be around in the teen picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If 4 int&#8217;s in 4 years is the case, then I&#8217;d pass on him at #6.  Nothing improves your DB&#8217;s more than having a pass rush&#8230;.trading down and getting Broderick Bunkley as a DE in the 3-4 might be a good call.  B.Y. is not getting any younger&#8230;.and if Bunkley&#8217;s not around Chad Greenway would be solid as a <span class="caps">OLB</span>.  I think both could be around in the teen picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: the dza</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-528</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-528</guid>
					<description>i don't like huff at #6.  he's not a playmaker (only 4 INTs as a four year starter! very lame).  maybe if we trade down but if we stay at #6 then let's take someone with playmaking ability, I'm hoping for 1)super mario 2) hawk or 3) davis.  if none of them are around trade back and then maybe take huff.  the 4 INTs in four years for a very good team really bothers me, anyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i don&#8217;t like huff at #6.  he&#8217;s not a playmaker (only 4 INTs as a four year starter! very lame).  maybe if we trade down but if we stay at #6 then let&#8217;s take someone with playmaking ability, I&#8217;m hoping for 1)super mario 2) hawk or 3) davis.  if none of them are around trade back and then maybe take huff.  the 4 INTs in four years for a very good team really bothers me, anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: shane</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-524</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-524</guid>
					<description>I would deffinitley be excited if we picked michael huff, and think he should be a corner. As long as we get either Huff, Hawk, or VD..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I would deffinitley be excited if we picked michael huff, and think he should be a corner. As long as we get either Huff, Hawk, or VD..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: P'Nelly</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-519</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-519</guid>
					<description>I think Hawk and Super Mario will be gone by #6, VD is the man if we stay put....I agree we could likely get Huff at #10 or so if we trade down.  What do you guys think about trading up and giving the 3rd or 4th that we got for Lloyd to get Williams or Hawk....not likely, but you never know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think Hawk and Super Mario will be gone by #6, VD is the man if we stay put&#8230;.I agree we could likely get Huff at #10 or so if we trade down.  What do you guys think about trading up and giving the 3rd or 4th that we got for Lloyd to get Williams or Hawk&#8230;.not likely, but you never know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erickson</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-512</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-512</guid>
					<description>Because Johnson is under contract for one more year. No reason to release Johnson. I see them running lots of 2 TE sets, with the TE's being Davis &amp;amp; Johnson. If you release Johnson, and draft Davis. You still have crap for your other TE's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Because Johnson is under contract for one more year. No reason to release Johnson. I see them running lots of 2 TE sets, with the TE&#8217;s being Davis &#038; Johnson. If you release Johnson, and draft Davis. You still have crap for your other TE&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-511</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-511</guid>
					<description>If the 49ers we're going to draft V.Davis they would have released johnson by now, why would they pay him and draft an instant starter? I think they are looking at Hawk, Huff, or trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If the 49ers we&#8217;re going to draft V.Davis they would have released johnson by now, why would they pay him and draft an instant starter? I think they are looking at Hawk, Huff, or trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erickson</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-510</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/23/pro-day-michael-huff/#comment-510</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't mind Huff but not at #6. I believe the team could still trade down a bit and pick him up. My choices in this order are 1. Davis 2. Hawk 3. Williams 4. Huff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind Huff but not at #6. I believe the team could still trade down a bit and pick him up. My choices in this order are 1. Davis 2. Hawk 3. Williams 4. Huff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
