<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agreement Reached with Harris</title>
	<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/</link>
	<description>Feed Your Niner Addiction</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-3660</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 21:39:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-3660</guid>
					<description>creeping mining perils fermented damper .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>creeping mining perils fermented damper .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jjbankhead</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-279</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-279</guid>
					<description>the other problem with woodson is that he hasn't done squat over the past few years, why do you think the raiders are releasing him to the FA?

its not like the guy has had a stellar year in the past few years, i was excited when he waa almost FA last year, but after seeing his numbers from last year he isn't quite so desireable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>the other problem with woodson is that he hasn&#8217;t done squat over the past few years, why do you think the raiders are releasing him to the FA?</p>
	<p>its not like the guy has had a stellar year in the past few years, i was excited when he waa almost FA last year, but after seeing his numbers from last year he isn&#8217;t quite so desireable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: shane</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-264</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-264</guid>
					<description>CALM ON NINERS... Stop messin with these nobodies. Not only are we not gettin big players were just waiting r cap on these nobody players..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">CALM ON NINERS</span>&#8230; Stop messin with these nobodies. Not only are we not gettin big players were just waiting r cap on these nobody players..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: darrel</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-262</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-262</guid>
					<description>Wow is Harris that bad? U guys make him sound like the next coming of plummer. Woodson way 2 pricey and his mouth has more game than anything(see Keyshawn)!!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow is Harris that bad? U guys make him sound like the next coming of plummer. Woodson way 2 pricey and his mouth has more game than anything(see Keyshawn)!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ninefan</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-261</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-261</guid>
					<description>waste of money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>waste of money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cuzo-P</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-257</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-257</guid>
					<description>ok. i admit that woodson's agent is a pain in the ass to deal with, but we have to go through the trouble because we would be aquiring a solid player. Harris is easily the worst corner in the league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>ok. i admit that woodson&#8217;s agent is a pain in the ass to deal with, but we have to go through the trouble because we would be aquiring a solid player. Harris is easily the worst corner in the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hoot</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-245</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-245</guid>
					<description>worst cornerback in the leauge. he only got beat about 200 times last year...trust me. what is nolan doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>worst cornerback in the leauge. he only got beat about 200 times last year&#8230;trust me. what is nolan doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-244</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-244</guid>
					<description>Sometimes I don't understand the few spaz fans that we have. So what if Nolan brings in one guy over the age of 30 at a contract that is probably near the league mininum for his age? He's brought in to provide depth, teach our younger guys a thing or 2, and probably be a nickel corner. Sometimes experience isn't necessarily such a bad thing.

Woodson is injured far too much, and his agents are far too big of a headache to deal with at the current time. Notice how Woodson hasn't really been contacted by any team at this point? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sometimes I don&#8217;t understand the few spaz fans that we have. So what if Nolan brings in one guy over the age of 30 at a contract that is probably near the league mininum for his age? He&#8217;s brought in to provide depth, teach our younger guys a thing or 2, and probably be a nickel corner. Sometimes experience isn&#8217;t necessarily such a bad thing.</p>
	<p>Woodson is injured far too much, and his agents are far too big of a headache to deal with at the current time. Notice how Woodson hasn&#8217;t really been contacted by any team at this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gelb72</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-241</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-241</guid>
					<description>So what happened to Nolan's mantra of saying that we will only sign younger guys with plenty of time in their career left?  Harris is a 10 year vet.  If that was the case we could get Woodson, but according to Nolan there is no interest in him.  I seriously dont understand this organizations philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So what happened to Nolan&#8217;s mantra of saying that we will only sign younger guys with plenty of time in their career left?  Harris is a 10 year vet.  If that was the case we could get Woodson, but according to Nolan there is no interest in him.  I seriously dont understand this organizations philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-237</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://49ersnews.blogsome.com/2006/03/15/agreement-reached-with-harris/#comment-237</guid>
					<description>yeah i know i put it in the wron one...sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>yeah i know i put it in the wron one&#8230;sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
